Information laundering: The Bascis

MK3|MK3Blog|Oct. 25, 2025


Information laundering is the process of deliberately concealing the origin, authenticity, or true nature of misleading or fabricated information by passing it through seemingly credible intermediaries or platforms to lend it an air of legitimacy. This manipulative technique operates similarly to money laundering but applies to the dissemination of propaganda, disinformation, and false narratives.
The process typically follows three core stages:
  1. Placement: False or misleading content is created and introduced into the information ecosystem. This often originates from anonymous sources, fringe websites, or state-sponsored operations. At this initial stage, the information appears dubious, lacking reliable sourcing or credible attribution.
  2. Layering: The information is then channeled through multiple intermediaries to obscure its true source. This involves having it picked up by partisan blogs, social media influencers, or faux-journalistic outlets that repackage the content without verifying its claims. With each subsequent share or republication, the original, disreputable source becomes less visible.
  3. Integration: Once the information has been sufficiently laundered, it is presented by mainstream or institutional voices—such as journalists citing “reports,” politicians referencing “growing concerns,” or academics analyzing “online discourse”—as though it emerged organically from multiple credible sources. This final stage embeds the false narrative into public debate, granting it undeserved credibility.
Common tactics used in information laundering include:
  • Astroturfing: Creating the illusion of widespread grassroots support for an idea or narrative using fake accounts and coordinated campaigns.
  • Use of Cutouts: Intermediaries who knowingly or unknowingly disseminate laundered information while obscuring its origins.
  • Exploiting Journalistic Norms: Manipulating the media’s reliance on “multiple sources” by creating an artificial echo chamber of reports.
  • Academics and Institutes: Leveraging compromised or ideologically aligned institutions to publish papers or host conferences that legitimize false claims.
This practice is especially prevalent in geopolitical influence operations, electoral interference, and corporate reputation management. By masking the true architects of a narrative, information laundering makes it difficult for the public to discern propaganda from legitimate reporting, eroding trust in institutions and polluting public discourse.



views