MK3 BLOG

Definition of tyranny

Tyranny is usually thought of as cruel and oppressive, and it often is, but the original definition of the term was rule by persons who lack legitimacy, whether they be malign or benevolent. Historically, benign tyrannies have tended to be insecure, and to try to maintain their power by becoming increasingly oppressive. Therefore, rule that initially seems benign is inherently dangerous, and the only security is to maintain legitimacy — an unbroken accountability to the people through the framework of a written constitution that provides for election of key officials and the division of powers among branches and officials in a way that avoids concentration of powers in the hands of a few persons who might then abuse those powers.

Tyranny is an important phenomenon that operates by principles by which it can be recognized in its early emerging stages, and, if the people are vigilant, prepared, and committed to liberty, countered before it becomes entrenched.

The psychology of tyranny

Perhaps one of the things that most distinguishes those with a fascist mentality from most other persons is how they react in situations that engender feelings of insecurity and inadequacy. Both kinds of people will tend to seek to increase their power, that is, their control over the outcome of events, but those with a fascist mindset tend to overestimate the amount of influence over outcomes that it is possible to attain. This leads to behavior that often brings them to positions of leadership or authority, especially if most other persons in their society tend to underestimate the influence over outcomes they can attain, and are inclined to yield to those who project confidence in what they can do and promise more than anyone can deliver.

This process is aided by a common susceptibility which might be called the rooster syndrome, from the old saying, "They give credit to the rooster crowing for the rising of the sun." It arises from the tendency of people guided more by hope or fear than intelligence to overestimate the power of their leaders and attribute to them outcomes, either good or bad, to which the leaders contributed little if anything, and perhaps even acted to prevent or reduce. This comes from the inability of most persons to understand complex dynamic systems and their long-term behavior, which leads people to attribute effects to proximate preceding events instead of actual long-term causes.

The emergence of tyranny therefore begins with challenges to a group, develops into general feelings of insecurity and inadequacy, and falls into a pattern in which some individuals assume the role of "father" to the others, who willingly submit to becoming dependent "children" of such persons if only they are reassured that a more favorable outcome will be realized. This pattern of co-dependency is pathological, and generally results in decision-making of poor quality that makes the situation even worse, but, because the pattern is pathological, instead of abandoning it, the co-dependents repeat their inappropriate behavior to produce a vicious spiral that, if not interrupted, can lead to total breakdown of the group and the worst of the available outcomes.

In psychiatry, this syndrome is often discussed as an "authoritarian personality disorder". In common parlance, as being a "control freak".

The logic of tyranny

In Orwell's classic fable, Nineteen Eighty-Four, the protagonist Winston Smith makes a key statement:

Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.

Following the trial of the surviving Branch Davidians in San Antonio, Texas, in March, 1994, in which a misinstructed jury acquitted all the defendants of the main crimes with which they were charged, but convicted them of the enhancements of using firearms in the commission of a crime, the federal judge, Walter F. Smith, first dismissed the charges, correctly, on the grounds that it is logically impossible to be guilty of an enhancement if one is innocent of the crime. However, under apparent political pressure, he subsequently reversed his own ruling and sentenced the defendants to maximum terms as though they had been convicted of the main crimes, offering the comment, "The law doesn't have to be logical."

No. The law does have to be logical. Otherwise it is not law. It is arbitrary rule by force.

Now by "logical" what is meant is two-valued logic, which is sometimes also called Boolean, Aristotelian or Euclidean logic. In other words, a system of propositions within which a statement and its negation cannot both be true or valid. One of the two must be false or invalid. The two possible values are true and false, and every meaningful proposition can be assigned one or the other value.

A system of law is a body of prescriptive, as opposed to descriptive, propositions, that support the making of decisions, and therefore its logic must be two-valued. It is a fundamental principle of law that like cases must be decided alike, and this means according to propositions that exclude their contradictions.

It is also a fundamental principle of logic that any system of propositions that accepts both a statement and its negation as valid, that is, which accepts a contradiction, accepts all contradictions, and provides no basis for deciding among them. If decisions are made, they are not made on the basis of the propositions, but are arbitrary, and that is the definition of the rule of men, as opposed to the rule of law.

So what Winston Smith is saying is that freedom means being able to distinguish between a true proposition and a false one, and what his nemesis O'Brien therefore does to crush him is make him accept that "2 + 2 = 5", which cannot be true if the logic is Aristotelian. O'Brien represents the logic of arbitrary power, a "logic" we might call Orwellian, although Orwell, whose real name was Eric Blair, was strongly opposed to it.

The methodology of tyranny

The methods used to overthrow a constitutional order and establish a tyranny are well-known. However, despite this awareness, it is surprising how those who have no intention of perpetrating a tyranny can slip into these methods and bring about a tyranny despite their best intentions. Tyranny does not have to be deliberate. Tyrants can fool themselves as thoroughly as they fool everyone else.

Control of public information and opinion

It begins with withholding information, and leads to putting out false or misleading information. A government can develop ministries of propaganda under many guises. They typically call it "public information" or "marketing".

Vote fraud used to prevent the election of reformers

It doesn't matter which of the two major party candidates are elected if no real reformer can get nominated, and when news services start knowing the outcomes of elections before it is possible for them to know, then the votes are not being honestly counted.

Undue official influence on trials and juries

Nonrandom selection of jury panels, exclusion of those opposed to the law, exclusion of the jury from hearing argument on the law, exclusion of private prosecutors from access to the grand jury, and prevention of parties and their counsels from making effective arguments or challenging the government.

Usurpation of undelegated powers

This is usually done with popular support for solving some problem, or to redistribute wealth to the advantage of the supporters of the dominant faction, but it soon leads to the deprivation of rights of minorities and individuals.

Seeking a government monopoly on the capability and use of armed force

The first signs are efforts to register or restrict the possession and use of firearms, initially under the guise of "protecting" the public, which, when it actually results in increased crime, provides a basis for further disarmament efforts affecting more people and more weapons.

Militarization of law enforcement

Declaring a "war on crime" that becomes a war on civil liberties. Preparation of military forces for internal policing duties.

Infiltration and subversion of citizen groups that could be forces for reform

Internal spying and surveillance is the beginning. A sign is false prosecutions of their leaders.

Suppression of investigators and whistleblowers

When people who try to uncover high level wrongdoing are threatened, that is a sign the system is not only riddled with corruption, but that the corruption has passed the threshold into active tyranny.

Use of the law for competition suppression

It begins with the dominant faction winning support by paying off their supporters and suppressing their supporters' competitors, but leads to public officials themselves engaging in illegal activities and using the law to suppress independent competitors. A good example of this is narcotics trafficking.

Subversion of internal checks and balances

This involves the appointment to key positions of persons who can be controlled by their sponsors, and who are then induced to do illegal things. The worst way in which this occurs is in the appointment of judges that will go along with unconstitutional acts by the other branches.

Creation of a class of officials who are above the law

This is indicated by dismissal of charges for     wrongdoing against persons who are "following orders".

Increasing dependency of the people on government

The classic approach to domination of the people is to first take everything they have away from them, then make them compliant with the demands of the rulers to get anything back again.

Increasing public ignorance of their civic duties and reluctance to perform them

When the people avoid doing things like voting and serving in militias and juries, tyranny is not far behind.

Use of staged events to produce popular support

Acts of terrorism, blamed on political opponents, followed immediately with well-prepared proposals for increased powers and budgets for suppressive agencies. Sometimes called a Reichstag plot.

Conversion of rights into privileges

Requiring licenses and permits for doing things that the government does not have the delegated power to restrict, except by due process in which the burden of proof is on the petitioner.

Political correctness

Many if not most people are susceptible to being recruited to engage in repressive actions against disfavored views or behaviors, and led to pave the way for the dominance of tyrannical government.

Avoiding tyranny

The only honorable course for a citizen is to conduct his life as though the Constitution, as originally understood, is in full force and effect, and if and when that brings him into conflict with public agents, to take a firm stance in opposition to their usurpations, regardless of consequences to himself, to them, or to others. Maintaining the Constitution, in every particular, is more important than human lives, even millions of them, if it should come to a choice. Individuals die. The Constitution needs to live for as long as one human remains alive, and perhaps even beyond that. 

— Jon Roland, 2003

--Context for blog post--

What are the odds the patsy taking the fall for the Charlie Kirk incident just so happens to have a transgender partner?

What are the odds the very last question Kirk was asked before being "unalived" was on tranny mass shooters in America?

Last month it was Minneapolis, this month Salt Lake City, both incidents involving tranny's in the narrative.

Do you see the pattern here?

What came from the Minneapolis PsyOp?

AI predictive policing and more reason for "personalized medicine."

Aside from the other telling signs and the obvious division this is causing (by design) this event will also justify both AI predictive policing (Palantir) and AI personalized medicine (Project Stargate) into the minds of the feeble masses – and yes even those who claim to be "awake."

I could be wrong (I want to be) but I haven't been so far...

While the public is distracted with headlines and culture wars, a series of quiet but decisive moves are reshaping the United States. The Epstein files remain sealed. Boycotting Israel is on the edge of becoming a federal offense. The economy is staggering under the weight of debt, inflation, and upward wealth transfer. And perhaps most dangerously, the meaning of words — particularly Nazi — is being bent and retooled to serve a new political purpose.

 This isn’t paranoia. It’s a pattern. And unless more people recognize it, America is being maneuvered into a future where surveillance, censorship, and control are normalized — all under the guise of “protecting democracy.”

 Epstein and the Politics of Secrecy

 The Epstein scandal should have been a moment of reckoning. Instead, it became another lesson in how effectively power protects itself. Despite endless speculation, only fragments of his network have ever been revealed. Now, by congressional maneuvering and judicial stonewalling, the remaining files are effectively locked away.

 The official line is that disclosure would harm “national security” or unfairly implicate the innocent. In reality, it keeps the machinery intact. Transparency here would topple too many pillars — political, financial, and cultural. And so, secrecy wins.

 Criminalizing Boycotts

 At the same time, legislation across multiple states and at the federal level has taken direct aim at boycotts of Israel. These “anti-BDS” measures do more than target one political movement; they carve a hole in the First Amendment.

 If political and economic boycotts — historically one of the most powerful nonviolent tools of American citizens — can be criminalized because they run counter to foreign policy, then the very concept of protected speech is hollow. It would mean Washington has the power to dictate not only what you can say, but what you can buy, sell, or refuse to purchase.

 That isn’t democracy. It’s policy enforcement by coercion.

 The Economy: Bleeding Out in Real Time

 Meanwhile, the economic reality for most Americans is grim. Inflation continues to devour wages. Debt has ballooned to historic levels. Servicing the interest alone now threatens to overwhelm the federal budget.

 On the ground, the middle and working classes are being hollowed out. Housing, food, fuel, and taxes consume nearly all disposable income. Whether the unraveling is intentional — a controlled demolition — or simply the consequence of decades of negligence doesn’t matter. The effect is the same: Americans are being stripped bare before the next phase of restructuring.

 Language as a Weapon: Redefining “Nazi”

 But perhaps the most insidious shift is linguistic.

 The word Nazi once referred specifically to the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. Over time, it became shorthand for authoritarianism, fascism, and absolute evil. Today, however, the term is increasingly untethered from history.

 There is a growing effort to flip the definition, recasting “Nazi” as a form of left-wing extremism. This linguistic sleight of hand serves a strategic purpose. Once established, it allows lawmakers and media alike to:

•  Label dissenters, populists, and gun owners as “Nazis.”

•  Justify mass surveillance, censorship, and unconstitutional laws under the banner of “fighting Nazism.”

•  Package authoritarianism itself as a moral crusade.

 It’s the same move that followed 9/11 with the word terrorist: stretch the label until it covers anyone the state wishes to target.

 Surveillance by Consent

 The groundwork for this has already been laid. Over the last decade, cancel culture and online witch hunts normalized the idea of punishing people for speech. Every time someone lost a job over a tweet, the precedent grew stronger: free expression is conditional, subject to the whims of outrage.By cheering on these purges, society gave implicit consent for mass surveillance. Neighbors snitched on neighbors. Employers policed thoughts as much as behavior. 

And the state — always watching — realized it could do the same on a national scale.

 What Comes Next

 So where does this leave us?

•  Litigation: Fighting through the courts is slow, costly, and rarely victorious. The system is designed to exhaust challengers.

•  Preparation: Building parallel networks, decentralized communication, and legal defense strategies is more practical than waiting for the system to correct itself.

•  Recognition: Most Americans won’t understand the magnitude of what’s happening until it’s irreversible. Those who do see it now have to prepare outside the herd.

 The Hard Truth

 The most bitter pill is this: those who eagerly participated in silencing others, enforcing conformity, and cheering on surveillance will never fully grasp the damage they enabled. They were useful to the machine, and once their role is complete, they’ll be discarded like everyone else.

 The few who recognize the game have a choice: adapt now, or be consumed in the reset.

MK3|Oct. 16,2025

An intentional controlled economic collapse is a situation where powerful actors (such as governments, central banks, or global financial institutions) deliberately cause or allow an economic downturn to occur, but in a way that is planned, staged, and managed rather than accidental or chaotic. The key idea is that the collapse isn’t the result of random market forces or natural cycles—it is engineered for a specific purpose.

Here’s a detailed breakdown:

1. Definition

• Intentional: The collapse is caused on purpose, not by mistake.

• Controlled: The collapse is managed in such a way that certain people or groups remain safe or benefit, while others absorb most of the damage.

• Economic Collapse: A rapid breakdown in financial and economic systems—things like currency devaluation, stock market crashes, mass unemployment, widespread bankruptcies, or disruption in supply chains.

2. Mechanisms Used to Trigger It

Those in control of economic levers can create collapse by manipulating:

• Monetary Policy: Printing too much money (hyperinflation) or tightening credit suddenly (deflation/recession).

• Interest Rates: Rapid hikes can choke borrowing and investment; rapid cuts can fuel bubbles that later pop.

• Currency Manipulation: Devaluing a national currency to wipe out savings or reset debt.

• Supply Chain Disruptions: Cutting off energy, food, or raw materials.

• Financial Market Policies: Withdrawing liquidity, restricting lending, or triggering defaults.

• Debt Crises: Allowing sovereign or corporate debt to balloon until default is unavoidable.

3. Why Would It Be Done?

An intentional collapse is typically engineered to achieve goals such as:

1. Debt Reset – Wiping out unpayable debt through currency collapse, default, or hyperinflation.

2. Power Consolidation – Destroying small businesses, middle-class wealth, and competitors so power consolidates with a few major players.

3. Introduction of a New System – Crashing the old economy to replace it with a new one (e.g., digital currency, centralized global banking system).

4. Wealth Transfer – Forcing assets to sell cheap during collapse so elites can buy them up.

5. Social Control – A collapse creates dependency on government relief, which strengthens political control.

4. Historical Examples

• The Great Depression (1929–1939): While debated, some argue policies worsened and prolonged it to reshape the financial order.

• Post-WWII Currency Devaluations: Nations intentionally collapsed their currencies to wipe out debts.

• The 1997 Asian Financial Crisis: Some analysts argue currency attacks and IMF interventions acted as a controlled reset.

• Modern “Great Reset” Concepts: Discussions from institutions like the World Economic Forum (WEF) describe restructuring the global economy through crises.

5. What Makes It “Controlled”?

• Timing: It happens in a staged manner rather than all at once.

• Preparation: Authorities have mechanisms in place (bailouts, emergency laws, digital IDs, etc.).

• Winners & Losers are Preselected: Elites, multinational corporations, or governments benefit, while ordinary citizens bear the brunt.

• Narrative Management: Media frames the collapse as “inevitable,” “unforeseen,” or “for the greater good.”

6. Red Flags of an Intentional Controlled Collapse

• Sudden, coordinated changes in global monetary policy (e.g., interest rate hikes across many countries at once).

• Simultaneous crises (energy, food, debt) that seem orchestrated rather than coincidental.

• Governments and corporations stockpiling resources while telling the public “everything is fine.”

• Introduction of “solutions” that were planned in advance (e.g., digital currencies, new financial regulations, emergency powers).

7. Impact on Society

• Short-term pain: Massive unemployment, inflation, loss of savings, bankruptcies.

• Middle class destruction: Wealth gap widens dramatically.

• Behavioral shift: Citizens become dependent on government handouts or controlled systems.

• New order: Once the collapse is “stabilized,” a new economic framework is imposed.

In short: an intentional controlled economic collapse is the deliberate crashing of an economy, orchestrated by those in power, to eliminate debt, seize assets, consolidate control, and reset financial systems—all while ensuring that the elites remain protected or even enriched.

Here’s a realistic, nuts-and-bolts “what it would look like from the outside” scenario—structured as phases with the kinds of signals you’d likely see, the policy moves that could plausibly follow, and the day-to-day effects. This is descriptive, not prescriptive (i.e., not instructions to do harm). It assumes powerful actors try to manage a major downturn to achieve a reset while keeping control of the outcome.

Phase 0 — Set the stage (6–18 months before “Day 0”)

What you’d notice

• Messaging about “resilience,” “systemic risks,” “harmonizing regulation,” and “modernizing payments.”

• Tighter rules for some sectors (mid-tier banks, non-bank lenders, crypto/fintech) juxtaposed with looser conditions for a few “too-big-to-fail” players.

• Quiet build-out of instant payments rails and government e-disbursement pipes (so relief money can move fast to households and firms).

• A few conveniently timed “tabletop exercises” around cyber risks to finance or energy, plus supply-chain stress drills.

Why this matters

• It doesn’t cause the shock, but it ensures the response playbook (liquidity taps, compliance switches, digital payouts) is ready the moment a trigger arrives.

Phase 1 — The trigger (“Day 0” to Week 2)

Candidate triggers (one or more)

• Funding squeeze: A large lender/real-estate trust or shadow-banking node misses payments. Short-term funding markets (commercial paper, repo) gap wider.

• Energy/logistics shock: Port stoppage, pipeline outage, or shipping lane disruption spikes fuel/transport costs and shelves go thin in certain regions.

• Payments outage / cyber event: A major card network, core processor, or large cloud provider has an incident. Retail payments stall for hours or days.

• Sovereign/municipal confidence wobble: A ratings action or failed debt auction forces abrupt repricing across bond markets.

What it looks like to you

• Overnight headlines: “temporary disruption,” “liquidity provision under review.”

• Spreads jump, stocks gap down, the dollar whipsaws, gold/energy flick higher.

• Your bank/fintech quietly raises fraud flags, lowers mobile-deposit limits, or delays ACH credits “for risk review.”

Phase 2 — Shock propagation (Weeks 2–6)

Market mechanics

• Liquidity preference: Lenders hoard cash. Lines of credit get “re-evaluated.” High-yield and private credit freeze for new deals.

• De-risking: Levered funds unwind; margin calls intensify selling; volatility feeds on itself.

• Inventory whiplash: Wholesalers shift to just-in-case inventories; delivery times lengthen; certain SKUs and parts go missing.

What you feel

• Employers pause hiring, overtime gets cut, contractors’ net-30 becomes net-60/90.

• Variable-rate borrowers (cards, some HELOCs) feel payments rise even as asset prices fall.

• Select shortages (diesel additives, specialty chips, medical disposables) cause odd local price spikes.

Phase 3 — “Controlled” response (Weeks 3–10)

Emergency policy levers (framed as temporary)

• Liquidity facilities: Central bank expands/revives lending windows; collateral rules relax so institutions can post more stuff for cash.

• Selective guarantees: Certain deposits or money-funds get backstops; others don’t. This channelsflows toward chosen nodes (big banks, systemic utilities).

• Administrative controls: Anti-gouging orders, export permits on critical goods, strategic releases from fuel/food stockpiles.

• Compliance switches: Tighter KYC/AML and reporting thresholds to “combat fraud during relief.”

• Payments rails: Treasury/central bank promote instant payout wallets for benefits, tax advances, or small-business bridge grants—delivered through a handful of large regulated intermediaries.

Narrative management

• “Short, sharp adjustment,” “targeted relief,” “we’re protecting savers and critical services.” The message: trust us, use the official channels.

Phase 4 — System reset moves (Months 3–12)

Balance-sheet triage

• Forced consolidation: Mid-tier banks and stressed lenders are merged into the largest institutions on favorable terms.

• Bail-in-ish outcomes (without the label): Junior creditors/equity eat losses; insured retail depositors are fine; select wholesale creditors are quietly made whole to prevent cascade.

Rules of the new game

• Capital & liquidity floors ratcheted up (harder for small competitors).

• Data & identity rails: Strong digital ID requirements tied to financial access “to reduce fraud in future crises.”

• Programmable compliance: Relief funds/wallets carry usage constraints (eligible merchants/categories), time limits, and geofencing for certain benefits or subsidies.

Currency & debt “re-denomination lite”

• No formal currency change needed. Instead, policy steers where money can go (e.g., incentives to buy approved goods, disincentives for others), creating a de facto dual-track system: highly controlled money (relief/benefits) vs. relatively free money (private savings) that faces more friction.

Phase 5 — “Stabilization” (Months 12–24)

Macro picture

• GDP stabilizes off a lower base; unemployment improves slowly; inflation is lower in controlled categories (fuel/food under caps/subsidies) and sticky elsewhere.

• Market structure is more concentrated: fewer banks, fewer suppliers, more dependence on large platforms/utilities.

Everyday reality

• You use 2–3 payment methods routinely: a traditional bank/debit, a platform wallet, and a government-linked benefits/relief wallet (even if you’re not on assistance, some rebates/tax credits may only flow there).

• Compliance pop-ups are normal (ID checks for large purchases, transfer caps, enhanced verification during “elevated risk windows”).

What’s “controlled” about this?

• Pre-positioned plumbing: Instant payouts, ready-to-switch compliance, emergency lending facilities.

• Selective rescue: Who gets backstopped (and who doesn’t) nudges the market toward consolidation.

• Narrative cadence: Coordinated talking points to keep behavior inside preferred channels.

• Policy toggle-ability: Dials (price caps, quotas, wallet rules) can be tightened/loosened without new legislation each time.

Constraints and frictions (why this isn’t omnipotent)

• Legal limits: In the U.S., many moves need statutory authority or face court challenges. States can resist certain mandates.

• Operational risk: Over-tight controls can backfire (black markets, cash preference, capital flight via legal channels).

• Public pushback: Trust can snap if benefits and controls feel unfair or permanent.

How an ordinary person might recognize the arc in real time (non-actionable signs)

• Funding stress tells: Short-term rates and spreads (e.g., CP vs. Treasuries) widen abruptly; banks draw more on central lending windows (often reported after the fact).

• Policy speed: Emergency facilities are announced within days of a headline shock, and eligibility is unusually precise.

• Control rails: Relief steered through a small set of institutions/wallets, with category limitations or expiry features.

• Rule ratcheting: Temporary controls get extended, then embedded into permanent regulation.

Plausible alternatives/variants

• “Cyber-first” version: The initial shock is a prolonged payments/cloud outage; the fix accelerates the rollout of “hardened” official rails with strict identity requirements.

• “Energy-first” version: A supply disruption puts fuel under rationing; digital vouchers appear for households and critical industries.

• “Debt-first” version: A refinancing wall in corporate/CRE debt triggers defaults; policy triage targets specific balance sheets while nudging assets into larger hands.

Practical, lawful resilience (sane, boring stuff)

• Keep liquidity buffers diversified across two reputable institutions; avoid unnecessary leverage and short-term ballooning obligations.

• Maintain redundant payment options (debit/credit, and a widely accepted third-party wallet) and a modest cash cushion for outages.

• For households and small firms: map critical bills and suppliers, know contingencies (backup vendors, alternative shipping) and keep 2–3 weeks of essentials (meds, consumables, data/document backups).

• Treat attention as capital: follow official policy notices and your providers’ risk advisories so you can adjust quickly and legally.

Bottom line

A “controlled collapse” wouldn’t look like cinematic chaos; it would feel like a sharp shock followed by highly managed recovery channels that just happen to leave the system more concentrated, more surveilled, and more rules-driven than before. The tell is less the crash itself and more the speed, selectivity, and programmability of the response. 

This is accomplished in three steps:

In step one, the victim’s identity is destroyed. This is achieved by depriving the victim of their basic needs and inflicting pain upon them until they become exhausted, confused, and disoriented. In this state, they no longer trust themselves and become receptive to guidance from an outside ‘authority.’

Step two, through a strict system of rewards and punishments the victim is imprinted with a new identity. The new identity is trained to self-isolate by having it denounce everything associated with the previous identity.

And finally with step three, through the continued use of trauma, the rebuilding of the victim’s new self is crafted and maintained however the mind controller chooses.

For this to work, the subject must remain oblivious to the fact that they are being ‘trained.’ This is accomplished by keeping them in a helpless victim state of mind with the use of trauma.

The entire method requires regular ritualistic abuse to keep the target in the victim state. Declassified documents show how drugs and sensory overload are used to inflict trauma upon the public, but high-level slaves are often procured from families with an established history of child abuse.

Inter-generational, or multi-generational trauma abuse is when a person abuses their child, and that child grows up to abuse their child, and that person grows up to abuse their child, and so on. This increases a person’s susceptibility to Trauma Based Mind Control.

Experiments with mice have shown that the offspring of a traumatized pregnant mother are born depressed and exhibit problems socializing with others. A nurturing upbringing by a healthy surrogate mother did not reverse the abnormal behaviors, indicating an in-utero transformation of the brain. And bioinformatic analyses revealed long-lasting alterations in the DNA. This is why the CIA is known for targeting children from families of multi-generational child abuse. They are easier to mind control. This is why world leaders are all from the same bloodlines.

This brutal technique has been used and understood for centuries. And if a group of people vying for power wanted a loyal army of soldiers, the easiest way would be by breeding them. And the evidence shows that this is how our society was created.

From the middle of the nineteenth century and well into the next, hundreds of thousands of orphans were distributed and sold in the United States. And millions worldwide. They were advertised, delivered by train, and sold at fairs. In America, these orphans were being managed and distributed by a private organization from Britain known as the Oddfellows. Many of whom were orphans themselves.

The Ancient Order of Oddfellows is an international fraternity whose members, such as Albert Pike and several US Presidents during the Orphan Train years, were often members of Freemasonic lodges as well. With their first official lodge in the United States established in 1819, the Oddfellows are officially committed to educating orphans, but they seem to have been procuring them and breeding them as well.

The Oddfellow’s first female chapter, The Daughters of Rebekah, was founded right before the orphan trains began and a depiction of their work shows hints of mass breeding and surrogate motherhood. They worked closely with the Oddfellows at large institutions known as Orphan Asylums and Foundling Asylums where many members themselves were born.

The Rothschild banking dynasty provided funding for several of these orphan asylums. According to Phillip Eugene de Rothschild, the family has privately bred over a hundred thousand offspring, including Adolf Hitler.

This is why pedophilia is so prevalent among the families of world leaders. While it is used for extortion, its primary function is for Trauma Based Mind Control. Because to the mind controller, trauma equals transformation. And there is nothing more traumatizing to a person than pedophilia.

If you had a million Mind Control Slaves placed in positions of power, then you could control entire nations. But only if the masses were also kept in a relative state of trauma.