MK3 BLOG

MK3|MK3Blog|Nov. 5, 2025

 Find out just what the people will submit to and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.

— Frederick Douglass, civil rights activist, Aug. 4, 1857

Definitions first:

• Cultural authority = the public’s felt legitimacy of federal direction. People obey because “that’s how we do things here.”

• Actual control = the state’s formal capacity to coerce (laws, budgets, guns, courts).

Empires don’t fail when they run out of cops. They fail when they run out of consent—when ordinary people stop wanting to go along. Coercion can lag years behind that loss. Here’s the sequence.

Phase 1 — Narrative Slippage (Soft, Denied, Measurable)

What happens:
The federal story stops fitting daily life. People still salute the flag; they stop trusting the narrator.

Mechanics

• Competence gaps: Promises vs. delivery (borders, inflation, energy, disasters).

• Double standards: One set of rules for insiders; another for you.

• Expert failure loops: Agencies contradict themselves; guidance whiplash trains citizens to ignore “updates.”

• Information overreach: “For your safety” becomes code for “because we said so.” That burns legitimacy.

Early indicators

• Trust in federal institutions falls below 40% and stays there.

• Voluntary compliance dips: tax gap widens, regulatory self-reporting declines, FOIA litigation climbs.

• Juries soften on federal prosecutions in certain venues (jury nullification-lite).

Result: People comply out of habit, not belief. Habits are brittle.

Phase 2 — Selective Compliance (The Quiet Rebellion)

What happens:
States, cities, agencies, and big actors begin picking which federal mandates to honor—and nothing breaks immediately. That’s the dangerous part.

Mechanics

• Sanctuary governance: Cities nullify federal priorities (immigration, drugs, speech) via policy, not proclamations.

• State preemption vs. fed: Attorneys general sue early and often; nationwide injunctions turn policy into courtroom ping-pong.

• Corporate arbitration: Firms route operations to friendly states; “policy by footprint.”

• Administrative lawfare: The real constitution becomes injunctions and settlement agreements.

Indicators

• Count of multi-state lawsuits vs. federal agencies spikes; preliminary injunctions freeze major rules on day one.

• Federal guidance yields “advisories,” not enforcement—agencies bluff with press releases.

• Compliance becomes regional: same federal rule, opposite behaviors in different circuits.

Result: Federal voice fragments; obedience becomes zip-code dependent.

Phase 3 — Parallel Sovereignties (One Flag, Multiple Operating Systems)

What happens:
“America” is still one country on paper, but daily life is governed by state/metro operating systems. The feds can still raid; they can’t set norms.

Mechanics

• Shield laws & compacts: States protect residents from out-of-state subpoenas/warrants; pass their own speech/health/gun regimes.

• DA sovereignty: Local prosecutors nullify federal priorities by starving cases of cooperation.

• Budget bargaining: Federal carrots/sticks (grants) fail to move noncompliant states; locals forfeit funds and move on.

• Critical infrastructure federalism: Power, ports, pipelines governed by state permits and public-utility commissions more than DC.

Indicators

• Interstate legal conflicts (warrants, subpoenas) increase; states refuse to execute each other’s orders.

• Federal task forces need state MOU buy-in to function; without it, they’re performative.

• National companies maintain policy forks: HR, safety, and compliance differ by region.

Result: Sovereignty becomes negotiated, not assumed. Cultural authority is now local.

Phase 4 — Control Lag (Coercion Without Conviction)

What happens:
The federal government can still enforce some things (taxes on big targets, headline arrests, defense). But without cultural authority, each use of force spends legitimacy instead of earning it.

Mechanics

• Symbolic enforcement: Big cases for TV; little day-to-day shaping of behavior.

• Capacity strain: Courts jammed; agents overworked; juries skeptical; plea bargains dominate.

• Backlash economics: Heavy-handed moves accelerate state resistance and private routing-around (crypto rails, arbitration clauses, interstate entity structuring).

Indicators

• Enforcement gets louder but narrower.

• “One weird trick” governance proliferates (workarounds, exemptions, carve-outs).

• Citizens treat DC guidance like weather: check it, plan around it, ignore it if costly.

Result: Actual control persists, but it no longer organizes the culture. That’s the real loss.

Why Authority Fades Before Control (the physics)

1. Coordination beats force. A population of millions cannot be coerced efficiently; it must be convinced.

2. Complexity punishes central error. The more intricate the economy, the faster competence gaps show.

3. Network federalism. States, counties, DAs, and corporates form coalitions that can nullify DC de facto without saying the word.

Historical Rhymes (not perfect, directionally right)

• Prohibition: Washington had laws and agents; the culture said “nope.” Authority died before control did.

• Desegregation (inverse case): Federal cultural authority was stronger than regional control; moral legitimacy let DC override local resistance.

• Late Rome / British Empire: Peripheral realities outgrew central narratives; the center kept rituals while authority migrated outward.

Lesson: Legitimacy is the main engine; force is the spare tire.

The Accelerants (what speeds the loss)

• Competence collapses in visible systems (energy blackouts, border chaos, flight control meltdowns).

• Unfairness optics (two-tier justice, insider immunity).

• Overreach in speech/information (perceived censorship = reputational arson).

• Process paralysis (permitting that never ends; rules that contradict).

The Brakes (what restores authority without a crisis)

1. Radical competence: Fix visible basics fast (power reliability, ports, borders, disaster response). People forgive ideology; they don’t forgive failure.

2. Even-handed justice: Equal rules for friends and enemies—publicly measurable.

3. Permitting realism: Time-boxed approvals for housing/energy/industry with default-approve at deadline.

4. Devolution on purpose: Admit federal limits; push execution to states with transparent scoreboards. Owning less but delivering more rebuilds trust.

5. Honest comms: Unvarnished problem statements + dated milestones. Humility beats spin.

Do those, and cultural authority returns before the tanks ever need to roll.

Dashboards You Can Track (no vibes)

• Institutional trust (rolling 4-Q, not one poll).

• Tax gap and voluntary compliance rates.

• Injunction velocity against major federal rules.

• State AG litigation count vs. federal agencies.

• Jury outcomes in marquee federal cases by circuit.

• Permitting cycle times for federally touched projects (energy, transport).

• Grid reliability (SAIDI/SAIFI) and port dwell times—competence at a glance.

When those trend bad, authority is leaking. When they reverse, authority is repairing.

Bottom Line

A federal government can keep control with badges and budgets long after it’s lost cultural authority—but that path is expensive and unstable. The practical fix isn’t grand theory; it’s a boring trinity: equal justice, visible competence, and honest limits. Nail those and the country starts obeying again by choice, which is the only kind that lasts.

MK3|MK3Blog|Nov. 4, 2025

un a lien able = un able to place A lien

Meaning our Rights cannot be taken from us until some debt has been paid. That's slavery. Debt slave, peonage.

[unalienable opposed to inalienable is important, as we see many unknowingly replacing the “un” with “in”]

 lien(n.)

"right to hold property of another until debt is paid," 1530s, from French lien "a band or tie" (12c.), from Latin ligamen "bond," from ligare "to bind, tie" (from PIE root *leig- "to tie, bind"). The word was in Middle English in the literal sense "a bond, fetter," also figuratively, "moral restraint."

https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=lien

 

In the world of legal and historical language, few terms spark as much confusion and debate as unalienable and inalienable. Both words frequently appear in discussions about human rights, especially when referencing America’s Declaration of Independence. 

But are they the same? Do they carry distinct meanings, or has their usage evolved into something interchangeable?

 Let’s dig in.

Understanding the Terms: Definitions and Etymology

To truly grasp the difference between unalienable and inalienable, we need to start with their definitions and roots. Both words stem from the Latin term alienare, which means “to transfer ownership” or “to make another’s.”

Adding the prefix “un-” or “in-” gives these words the opposite meaning: something unable to be transferred or taken away.

 Key Definitions

• Unalienable: Something that cannot be sold, transferred, or surrendered under any condition.
• Inalienable: Something that cannot be taken away but might be voluntarily waived under specific circumstances.

Origins:

The term unalienable gained prominence during the 18th century, especially in legal and philosophical contexts.

Inalienable emerged later, becoming a more modern usage.

Both terms have been used in law, literature, and everyday language, often interchangeably.

The Declaration of Independence: Unalienable vs. Inalienable

The phrase “unalienable Rights” is one of the most famous lines in American history, found in the Declaration of Independence. But was this word choice deliberate? Let’s unpack the details.

Jefferson’s Original Draft

• In Thomas Jefferson’s first draft, the term inalienable was used.
• During editing, unalienable replaced it. Scholars suggest this was due to the stylistic preferences of Jefferson’s contemporaries, such as John Adams.

Why “Unalienable”?

• At the time, unalienable was the more commonly used term in legal and philosophical writing.
• It also carried a stronger sense of immutability, aligning with the Enlightenment ideals that shaped the Declaration.

Tracing Historical Usage in Founding Documents

Both terms have appeared in key American documents and speeches over time. Let’s examine how they’ve been used.

Early Usage

• Federalist Papers: The term inalienable appeared more frequently here.
• State Constitutions: Varied usage, with some adopting unalienable and others using inalienable.

Examples

• Virginia Declaration of Rights (1776): Used “unalienable.”
• Massachusetts Constitution (1780): Preferred “inalienable.”

Key Takeaway

The usage of these terms was often dictated by regional preferences or the writing styles of individual authors, rather than a strict distinction in meaning.

Sentiments of the Era: Language of Liberty

The Enlightenment thinkers of the 18th century heavily influenced the phrasing in the Declaration. Philosophers like John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau argued that certain rights like life, liberty, and property were natural rights. These rights were not granted by governments but inherent to all individuals.

Philosophical Influence

• John Locke referred to these rights as unalienable.
• Rousseau leaned more toward the term inalienable in his writings on the social contract.

Reflection in Language

The preference for unalienable in the Declaration reflects the emphasis on natural law as something immutable and inviolable.

Modern Usage: Trends in Language

Today, you’re more likely to encounter inalienable in modern texts and discussions. Why?

Linguistic Shift

• Inalienable gained popularity in the 19th and 20th centuries, likely due to its smoother sound in speech and writing.
• Unalienable, while still understood, is often viewed as archaic.

Modern Examples

• Legal Contexts: Terms like “inalienable rights” are standard in international human rights law.
• Speeches and Literature: Contemporary leaders often favor “inalienable” for its modern resonance.

Fact Check

• According to Google Ngram Viewer, the usage of “inalienable” overtook “unalienable” by the mid-1800s.

Are They Truly Interchangeable? A Linguistic and Legal Perspective

Linguistic Insights

• Most dictionaries define the two terms as synonyms.
• However, legal scholars note that unalienable carries a stronger sense of absolute non-transferability, while inalienable might allow for certain voluntary waivers.

Real-World Case Study

In legal debates, this distinction can be critical. For example:

• A case involving inalienable rights might consider whether an individual waived their rights under specific conditions.
• A case citing unalienable rights would argue those rights cannot be waived under any circumstance.

Drafts of the Declaration: Digging Deeper

The Declaration of Independence went through multiple drafts before its final version. Each draft offers insights into the thought process behind its language.

Changes Made

• First Draft: Used “inalienable.”
• Final Version: Edited to “unalienable.”

Why the Change?

Historians suggest that the change reflected the editorial influence of Adams and Franklin, who preferred the more traditional unalienable.

Presidential Perspectives: Evolution of Language in Speeches

Throughout history, U.S. presidents have used both terms in their speeches, often reflecting the political climate of their time.

Examples

• Abraham Lincoln: Often referred to unalienable rights in the context of abolition and liberty.
• John F. Kennedy: Favored inalienable in his discussions of civil rights.

Takeaway

While both terms are understood, their usage often mirrors the speaker’s stylistic preferences and the context of the message.

Synonyms and Related Concepts

In discussions of rights, unalienable and inalienable are part of a broader conversation about natural rights and human dignity.

Common Synonyms

• Natural Rights
• Fundamental Rights
• Human Rights

Nuances

While these terms overlap, unalienable and inalienable emphasize the idea that these rights cannot be taken away or transferred.

Why It Matters Today

Understanding the difference between unalienable and inalienable isn’t just a matter of semantics. It’s about appreciating the philosophical foundations of human rights and how they continue to shape legal systems and political discourse worldwide.

Conclusion: Resolving the Debate

While the terms unalienable and inalienable may seem interchangeable, their subtle differences reflect the evolution of language and philosophical thought. Both terms underline the same core idea: certain rights are so fundamental, they’re beyond the reach of government or society to alter or revoke.

The debate may never fully disappear, but what’s clear is the enduring power of these words in defining freedom and liberty.

FAQs

1. What’s the main difference between unalienable and inalienable?

The main difference lies in usage. Unalienable is considered more absolute, while inalienable might imply voluntary waiver in specific cases.

2. Why does the Declaration of Independence use “unalienable”?

The term was more common in the 18th century and reflected the stylistic preferences of the time.

3. Which term is more commonly used today?

Inalienable is more commonly used in modern contexts, particularly in international human rights law.

4. Are unalienable and inalienable rights protected differently under the law?

Legally, both terms are interpreted similarly, though nuances may arise in specific cases.

5. What are examples of unalienable rights?

Common examples include life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, as outlined in the Declaration of Independence.

MK3|MK3Blog|Nov. 4, 2025

Operation Midnight Climax: 

Operation Midnight Climax was a sub-project of MK Ultra, and was headed by George Hunter White…who was a Captain in the Army and both a FBI agent and C-I-A operative.  

During the day, White worked as an FBI agent to keep psychoactive drugs out of circulation, but when night fell, he and other agents dispensed psychoactive drugs (namely LSD) to strangers in San Francisco and New York. 

Thousands of unwitting men were lured to CIA-sponsored drug and sex sessions by prostitutes at CIA’s “safe houses.” 

The prostitutes received $100 a night and were guaranteed protection from police harassment. 

LSD and other mind-altering substances were slipped into the johns’ liquor by the hookers, and their sexual encounters were monitored and recorded from behind two-way mirrors. These taped sexual encounters were useful for blackmailing johns — some of who were prominent upstanding citizens.

MK3|MK3Blog|Nov. 3, 2025

Today I’m going to continue with the discussion regarding the medical experiments on humans, that took place after Project Paperclip. 

 We ended yesterday with the experiments that took place from the 1940s til the 1960s.  Today we start with the 1970s through the 1990s. 

 Tomorrow I will discuss some other experiments that occurred during these time frames, but because I am short on time today, I will discuss those tomorrow. Some of those experiments are the fluoride experiments and Operation Cloverleaf (chem trails). Thursday we will discuss some of the other operations involving Paperclip scientists, including those involving mind control.

First…some additional information on aspartame…

1981: Dr Miguel A. Baret of the Dominican Republic removed milk from 360 children’s diets, because cow’s milk has a specific protein that can cause diabetes, especially in children. They drank juice laced with aspartame instead, and many developed “abnormal restlessness, lack of concentration, irritability and depression.”

 When Dr Baret removed it: “The results were astonishing. Their symptoms disappeared in 4-6 days in ALL of them!

1987: Dr Louis Elsas, Professor of Pediatrics & Genetics at Emory University, testified before Congress; “Aspartame is in fact a well known neurotoxin and teratogen (triggers birth defects) which in some undefined dose will... in the developing child or fetal brain...produce irreversible adverse effects.  I am particularly angry at this type of advertising that is promoting the sale of a neurotoxin in the childhood age group.”

 Neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, MD, declares Aspartame is a toxin like arsenic and cyanide that causes confusion, disorientation, seizures, cancer, pancreatic, uterine, ovarian and brain tumors and leads to Alzheimer’s.

1993: The FDA approved aspartame as an ingredient in numerous food items that would always be heated to above 86°degrees F (30°Degrees C). An act that can only be described as “unconscionable”

1996: Without public notice, the FDA removed all restrictions from aspartame allowing it to be used in everything, including all heated and baked goods.

1972:  PSYCHOSURGERY: Black children, as young as five years old, were having psychosurgery performed on them at the University of Mississippi in Jackson in order to control “hyperactive” and “aggressive” behavior. Their brains were implanted with electrodes that were heated up to melt areas of the brain that regulate emotion and intellect.

Mid-1970’s:  AIDS IN AFRICA: The incidence of AIDS infections in Africa coincided exactly with the locations of the W.H.O. smallpox vaccination program in the mid-1970’s.

1975: VIRUS CANCER PROGRAM:

A special virus-cancer program is initiated by the US Navy at The Cancer Research Facility at Fort Detrick.

The goal was to develop cancer-causing viruses.  It is also here that retro-virologists isolate a virus to which no immunity exists. It is later named HTLV (Human T-cell Leukemia Virus).

1976: SWINE FLU INOCULATION PROGRAM:

Just as the so-called “SWINE FLU” inoculation program was getting under way, the news reported that fallout from an “alleged” Chinese nuclear blast (on September 26) was taking place.

Initial reports about this came from Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, Connecticut, and certain areas of the Pacific Northwest.

Radioactive iodine-131 was showing up in milk, but everyone was told there was no real danger. In the days that followed, elderly people began dying of heart attacks shortly after taking swine flu shots.

 The Government quickly assured everyone that their deaths didn’t really matter, as they would have died anyway.  The Swine Flu inoculation program continued on…

1976 LEGIONNAIRES DISEASE:

 A chemical warfare experimentation program began in Philadelphia at the American Legion Convention. Aerosol spray cans containing poisoned room freshener were used to selectively saturate the atmosphere with Legionnaires.

 Two of the active ingredients in the poison that produced the Legionnaires Disease were plutonium and zirconium. Afterwards the special spray cans were taken to a small airport on the Northwest side.

 About a month later, the poison was reformulated, still using plutonium, but adding another poison to the mixture...

 

Read more »

MK3|MK3Blog|Nov. 2, 2025

Many of us believe that it has been only recently that the Cabal/Deep State has had an agenda to harm us all with the vaccines, or medicines like Remdesivir. 

Sadly, this “agenda” has been going on for a very long time.  Today I am going to focus on the nefarious chemical/medical experiments that were developed since the Nazi scientists started coming to our country after 1945. This presentation is long so I am going to break it up into several days. Today we will discuss 1940s-1960s. Tomorrow will cover experiments after 1970.

OSS:

Prior to the scientists coming over during Project Paperclip, our Intelligence Agency used to be called the OSS. 

The Office of Strategic Services  was the intelligence agency of the United States during World War II. The OSS was formed as an agency of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) to coordinate espionage activities behind enemy lines for all branches of the United States Armed Forces. Other OSS functions included the use of propaganda, subversion, and post-war planning.

The OSS was dissolved a month after the end of World War 2. At that point the OSS became two departments… The INR ( Department of State's Bureau of Intelligence and Research) and the C-I-A (Central Intelligence Agency).

THE 1940s:

1947: The C-I-A begins its study of LSD as a potential weapon for use by the Intelligence agencies. Human subjects were both civilian and military.  Some were used with and without their knowledge. 

1947: PLUTONIUM: Colonel E.E. Kirkpatrick of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission issues a secret document stating that the agency will begin administering intravenous doses of radioactive substances to human subjects.

Before dropping the bombs that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, U.S. scientists secretly tested the bomb’s effects on unsuspecting U.S. citizens.

During the Manhattan Project, 18 patients were injected with plutonium. 

This includes:

Project Oak Ridge, located in what is now known as Oak Ridge, Tennessee…in which soldiers were injected with micrograms of plutonium.

Later, three patients at the Chicago hospital were also injected.

1950's

1950: OPERATION SEA SPRAY: Beginning on September 26, 1950, the crew of a U.S. Navy minesweeper ship spent six days spraying two strains of bacteria...Serratia marcescens as well as Bacillus globigii...into the air about two miles off the coast of Northern California.

The project was called “Operation Sea Spray,”

Bioweapon attack by our military??

In the following days, the military took samples at 43 sites to track the bacteria's spread, and found that it had quickly infested not only the city, but surrounding suburbs as well.

Residents inhaled millions of bacterial spores. Many came down with pneumonia.

Yet…they never told us residents of the San Francisco Bay Area.

That changed when one week after the test, 11 local residents checked into Stanford University Hospital complaining of urinary tract infections.

Upon testing their urine, doctors noticed that the pathogen had a red hue.

Infection with Serratia was so rare that the outbreak was extensively investigated by the University to identify the origins of this scarlet letter bug.

One man died of Serratia marcescens.

Many believe that the release has changed the San Francisco Bay area’s microbial ecology ever since.

1950: 

Department of Defense begins plans to detonate nuclear weapons in desert areas and monitor downwind residents for medical problems and mortality rates.

1950: PROJECT BLUEBIRD…later known as PROJECT ARTICHOKE: The C-I-A’s mind control program begins. Project BlueBird was an off-shoot of Project MK Ultra. Bluebird/Artichoke involved in-house experiments with interrogation techniques, using sodium pentathol  and hypnosis.  Their goal was to make sure that intelligence agents wouldn’t spill secrets under interrogation.

1950: PROJECT MK ULTRA:

This program has also been referred to as the “CIA’s mind control program.” The C-I-A coordinated its program with the US Army’s Chemical Corp. As we’ve learned the people behind MK Ultra used drugs (especially LSD), chemicals, hypnosis, sensory deprivation, toruture, isolation, verbal abuse, and sexual abuse…in order to manipulate and alter brain functions.

Project MK Ultra  research was undertaken at 80 institutions… including 44 colleges and universities, as well as hospitals, prisons, and pharmaceutical companies. The CIA operated through these institutions using “front organizations”, although some officials at these institutions were aware of the CIA’s involvement.

1955: WHOOPING COUGH: Undisclosed bacteria was released by the Army & The C-I-A in the Tampa Bay region of Florida…causing a dramatic increase in whooping cough infections. 12 people died.

1956: ZINC CADMIUM SULFIDE:

Army researchers dispersed zinc cadmium sulfide (now a known cancer-causing agent) over Minnesota and other Midwestern States to see how far it would spread in the atmosphere. 

The particles were detected more than 1,000 miles away in New York and DC. The residents were told these tests were harmless “smoke screen tests”...so that cities might be hidden from radar-guided missiles.

1956: YELLOW FEVER:

U.S. military releases mosquitoes infected with Yellow Fever over Savannah, Georgia and Avon Park, Florida.

Following each test, Army agents… posing as public health officials… test victims for effects.

1958: LSD is tested on 95 volunteers at the Army’s Chemical Warfare Laboratories for its effect on intelligence.

1960s:

1960: PROJECT THIRD CHANCE: The Army Assistant Chief-of-Staff for Intelligence (ACSI) authorizes field testing of LSD in Europe.

PROJECT DERBY HAT: That same testing as above, but the testing was done in Asia.

1963-VACCINES: According to scientists, the mass vaccination campaigns of the 1950s and ’60s may be the cause of hundreds of deaths a year,  because of a cancer-causing virus that contaminated the first polio vaccine…known as SV40. 

SV40 was a virus that came from dead monkeys, whose kidney cells were used to culture the first Salk vaccines.

The virus was injected into tens of millions during the vaccination campaigns. After it was detected in 1963 it was screened out.  Those born between 1941 and 1961 are thought to be most at risk of having been infected.

1965:  ASPARTAME:

Aspartame is the technical name for the brand names, NutraSweet, Equal, Spoonful, and Equal-Measure.

Aspartame was discovered by accident in 1965, when James Schlatter, a chemist of G.D. Searle Company was testing an anti-ulcer drug. Aspartame was approved for dry goods in 1981 and for carbonated beverages in 1983.

Aspartame was acquired by Monsanto in 1985. For 16 years the FDA refused to approve its use for consumption. But then in 1981 Commissioner Arthur Hayes overruled the objections of a Public Board of Inquiry, and the protests of the American Soft Drink Association.  Then the FDA made a turn-around... and blessed it.

The tests submitted by Searle were so bad that the Department of Justice initiated  prosecution of Searle for fraud. The case dragged on long enough that the statute of limitations ran out.

Aspartame/Nutrasweet is a toxin that…blinds, causes fatigue, drops intelligence, eradicates memory, and grows brain tumors and other cancers. It also causes depression, ADD, panic, rage, paranoia, diabetes, seizures, suicide and death.

This toxin is supported by unlimited advertising by the American Dietetics Association, the American Diabetes Association, the AMA, and whomever else, to convince us it's safe.

1965: PROJECT MKSEARCH: This was the project of the C-I-A and the Department of Defense. This program evaluated the use of mind-altering drugs and its ability to manipulate human behavior.

1965: AGENT ORANGE.

Prisoners at the Holmesburg State Prison in Philadelphia are subjected to dioxin, the highly toxic chemical component of Agent Orange that was used in Vietnam. The men were later studied for the development of cancer…which indicate that Agent Orange had been a suspected carcinogen all along.

1966: OPERATION BIG CITY (also called Operation Open Air):

The virus Bacillus subtilis was released throughout the New York subway system… by the U.S. Army’s Special Operations Division.

They did this by dropping lightbulbs filled with bacteria onto the tracks in midtown Manhattan. 

The bacteria was carried for miles throughout the subway system. Due to the large number of people exposed, it would be impossible to prove.

The bacteria was also secretly released at Washington’s International Airport as well as DC’s Greyhound terminal.

MK NAOMI:

The C-I-A and the Department of Defense implemented Project MKNAOMI, (successor to MKULTRA & MK Delta). 

The project lasted from the 1950s through the 1970s. It focused on biological projects including biological warfare agents.

MK-NAOMI’s mission: to provide the C-I-A with every means possible to maim or kill targeted groups or individuals through the use of toxic and lethal biochemical agents.

Here were some of the key objectives listed:

How to knock off key people. How to make death look as if from natural causes (such as ways to produce cancer…or to make it appear as a heart attack).

1968: Poisoning Water:

The C-I-A experimented with the possibility of poisoning drinking water by injecting chemicals into the water supply of the FDA in Washington, D.C.

1967/68  MKOFTEN:

MK Often would be a joint effort between the CIA and the Department of Defense, and would be one of the most bizarre of the subprojects of MKUltra.

It was alleged to include the use of occultism and ritual magic. According to the Department of Defense, however, the goal of MKOFTEN and its sister-project MKSEARCH was to, "test the behavioral and toxicological effects of certain drugs on animals and humans".

There were claims that Dr. Sidney Gottlieb (C-I-A) used "Operation MK Often" to "explore the world of black magic" and to "harness the forces of darkness and challenge the concept that the inner reaches of the mind are beyond reach".

As part of Operation Often, Dr. Gottlieb and other C-I-A employees visited with and recruited fortune-tellers, palm-readers, clairvoyants, astrologists, mediums, psychics, specialists in demonology, witches and warlocks, Satanists, other occult practitioners, and more.